Case Study / Interview Study

Analyzing the Impact of Immigration Enforcement by Local Officials on Access to Care among Latinos

The rapid growth of the immigrant Latino population in North Carolina and nationwide has led to immigration policies that may have a potentially profound impact on utilization of public health services. This study will evaluate whether a relationship exists between local immigration law enforcement and the utilization of public health services, especially prenatal care, by Latinos. The team will collect qualitative data in North Carolina on (1) Latinos' willingness to seek public health services as it relates to the threat of immigration enforcement, and (2) how attitudes and behaviors have changed since implementation of the immigration enforcement program. Using statewide prenatal care data from 2000 through 2009, the team will explore how immigration enforcement affects utilization of prenatal care among Latinas to determine trends and differences in: (1) the month of gestation for a first prenatal visit, and (2) the total number of prenatal visits.

 

Grant Number: 69701

Funding Date: Sun, 01/01/2012

Researching Institution: Wake Forest University

Researcher: Scott D. Rhodes, PhD; Mark A. Hall, JD

Measuring the Impact of Sources and Types of Funding on Health Care Outcomes for Children in Foster Care in Ohio

Public health law research usually focuses on the substantive laws that effect health, not the accompanying funding laws. This study addresses a question that permeates public health law research: does the source and/or type of funding, not just the amount of funding, impact health outcomes? In 44 of Ohio's 88 counties, there is a dedicated local levy that provides flexible local child welfare funding. In 18 of the 88 counties, there was a IV-E waiver to provide flexible federal funding. The project analyzes 10 years of county level data provided by Public Children's Services Association of Ohio. Findings will identify key elements of successful funding strategies that may be adopted in other jurisdictions to improve outcomes for children in state care and thereby improve the mental health of children who have experienced state care.

Grant Number: 6388

Funding Date: Tue, 11/15/2011

Researching Institution: Research Foundation of State University of New York on behalf of University at Buffalo

Researcher: Susan Mangold, JD; Crystal Ward Allen, MSW; Catherine Cerulli, JD, PhD; Rhonda Reagh

Are local lead laws the key to reaching children at risk?

State and federal laws removing paint from gasoline and from the paint used in homes were put in place decades ago.  Overall, they have been very effective in reducing the number children who are poisoned by lead.  But there are still numerous “hot spots” where children (particularly low-income, minority children living in older neighborhoods) continue to be poisoned by lead at alarming levels.  Those children simply have not been reached by the protections of the state and federal laws.  In order to find out whether local laws can be an effective tool to reach these children we will take a close look at a local housing inspection law put into place in Rochester, New York in 2006, and will look as well at laws in several other cities, to see if and how local legislation can be used as a tool to more effectively to fill the gap. The results of the study will be available to lawmakers, community advocates, policy analysts and scholars interested in evaluating or enacting local laws in their own communities.

Grant Number: 68390

Funding Date: Mon, 11/15/2010

Researching Institution: University of Rochester Medical Center

Researcher: Katrina Korfmacher, M.S., Ph.D.; Michael Hanley, J.D.

Results

Download a one-page Research Brief summarizing the paper's findings.

Korfmacher K.S., Ayoob M., Morley R. (2011). Rochester’s Lead Law: Evaluation of a Local Environmental Health Policy InnovationEnvironmental Health Perspective, 120(2), 309-315. doi:10.1289/ehp.1103606

Katrina S. Korfmacher and Michael L. Hanley. "Are Local Laws the Key to Ending Childhood Lead Poisoning?" Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2013;vol(2208603). 10.1215/03616878-2208603.

How does the legal authority for infectious disease surveillance affect states' ability to respond to emerging threats?

The aims of this study are to assess: (1) whether state reporting laws for novel H1N1 influenza and emerging infections impact the ability of public health to collect data elements on individual cases, (2) whether state reporting laws for novel H1N1 influenza and emerging infections impact the ability of public health to develop recommendations for disease prevention, control, and treatment, and (3) the effect of “home rule” in a state’s infectious disease reporting structure on the state’s ability to develop such recommendations. The research team will conduct mapping and implementation studies by collecting data in three areas: legal authority, epidemiologic data collected on novel H1N1 influenza cases, and CDC and state recommendations. Methods will include an inventory of each state’s reporting laws/structure for emerging infections and interviews with state officials. Findings have the potential to impact law, public health policy, and epidemiology. Infectious disease reporting is the foundation for public health’s core functions in infectious disease prevention and control. Novel H1N1 influenza provides a critical example of the difference in states’ ability to promptly gather relevant data on a disease of national importance. This study has great public health significance because it is extremely important to understand the role law played in the differences among states. Law is a potentially modifiable factor and policymakers may choose to improve state laws if value is demonstrated. By addressing the proposed questions, we hope to assess the public health benefit/detriment of differing state authorities for reporting. Findings may impact policy by showing the effect of reporting laws on public health response and suggesting modifications to disease reporting laws that states may want to adopt.

Grant Number: 68401

Funding Date: Mon, 11/15/2010

Researching Institution: Minnesota Department of Health

Researcher: Richard Danila, Ph.D., M.P.H.; Anne Barrry, J.D., M.P.H.

What sodium-reduction public health laws and policies work?

Consuming too much salt (sodium chloride) puts Americans at risk for high blood pressure, a leading cause of heart attack and stroke.  In 2010, U.S. medical and lost productivity costs from high blood pressure alone were more than $76 billion. Researchers estimate that reducing sodium in the U.S. food supply could prevent more than 100,000 U.S. deaths annually. Beginning in 2011, the National Conference of State Legislatures and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention will partner to review what public health policy options are available to help reduce salt in the foods we eat as a means of reducing high blood pressure, its costs and health consequences; and study which options may achieve the greatest consensus among policymakers.

Grant Number: 68397

Funding Date: Mon, 11/15/2010

Researching Institution: National Conference of State Legislatures

Researcher: Amy Winterfeld, J.D.; Janelle Gunn, M.P.H., R.D.

Results

Winterfeld, A. (2012). "Shake the Salt Habit". Health Reform Two Years Later: The Policy, Politics and Problems (p. 8). Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.

What is the impact of local health department structure and policy on public health outcomes?

This study examines the policies and structures of local and state health departments, and how they impact public health. The study will focus on the structural arrangements of the local boards of health (such as whether the boards of health are elected or appointed) and the level of state health department centralization, and how they affect performance, fiscal health, innovation, collaboration, and strategic planning. In addition to contributing to the ongoing dialogue regarding health department accreditation, this study will provide a road map for policy makers, planners, administrators and individual citizens for years to come.

Grant Number: 68400

Funding Date: Mon, 11/15/2010

Researching Institution: University of Illinois

Researcher: Scott Hays, Ph.D.

What is the impact of laws addressing consumption and purchase of sugar-sweetened and citric-acid drinks on oral health?

Dental erosion is a widespread and increasing problem. This study will answer the question of what law and legal practices impact the consumption and purchase in Central Appalachia of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and citric acid drinks (CADs) that adversely affect oral health. The study will generate original data from dentists and residents of Central Appalachia concerning the oral health of the residents, the consumption and purchase of SSBs and CADs, and the social acceptability to the residents of Central Appalachia of legal interventions regarding the sale and availability of SSBs and CADs.

Grant Number: 68392

Funding Date: Mon, 11/15/2010

Researching Institution: Appalachian School of Law

Researcher: Priscilla Harris, J.D.; J. Anthony von Fraunhofer, PhD, MSc

How can public health law support intervention in drug overdoses?

Drug overdose deaths have surpassed traffic fatalities in Washington State and 15 other states. This study will examine the legal intent, implementation and outcomes of a new Washington state law to support intervening in drug overdoses. The law includes a Good Samaritan component that provides legal immunity from drug possession charges for people who overdose or seek aid for another person’s overdose. It also allows the prescribing of an opioid antidote medicine (Naloxone) to drug users and their partners. Evaluation will be conducted on the development of the legislation and the impact of the law on Seattle area heroin users, bystanders, and police during overdoses as well as the impacts on community health outcomes.

Grant Number: 68396

Funding Date: Mon, 11/15/2010

Researching Institution: University of Washington

Researcher: Caleb Banta-Green, Ph.D. M.P.H. M.S.W.; Patrica Kuszler, M.D., J.D.

Results

Summary of Initial Findings

Passage of the “911 Good Samaritan Overdose Law” took five years, keys to passage included:

  • Framing the law as a public health issue, not primarily as a legal issue.
  • The emergence of prescription medicines (e.g. opiate pain medicines) as the drugs involved in a  majority of drug overdoses. This increased the perceived public health risks of overdose and broadened the populations, demographically and geographically, that could be helped by legislative action.
  • Keeping the scope of immunity narrow, just drug possession, was the only way to get support of law enforcement, prosecutors, and some legislators.

First responders’ and opiate users’ experience with overdose included:

  • Opiate overdoses are common---42% of opiate users and 62% of Seattle police reported being present at the scene of a serious opiate overdose in the prior year.  (Almost all opiate users surveyed at syringe exchange used heroin.)
  • Most paramedics had been at an overdose in the prior year and approximately 45 serious opiate  overdose victims (heroin or pharmaceutical) are transported by Seattle medics each month.
  • Police were at the scene of most overdoses for which 911 was called according to drug users and paramedics.
  • Arrests of overdose victims and bystanders were very rare according to drug users, paramedics, and police.

Impacts of Good Samaritan Law on planned behaviors:

  • 88% of opiate users indicated that now that they were aware of the law they would be more likely to call 911 during future overdoses. 
  • 62% of police surveyed said the law would not change their behavior during a future overdose because they would not have made an arrest for possession anyway, 20% were unsure what they would do, and 14% said they would be less likely to make such an arrest.

Information dissemination:

  • Funding for implementation of the law was not included in the legislation and no state agency was assigned responsibility for implementing the law.
  • Information dissemination has involved the limited distribution of written educational materials.
  • The website http://stopoverdose.org appears to be a frequently accessed source of information.
Has the federal Lead and Copper Rule improved public health?

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering revisions to the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR). The revisions will help reduce the public health problems caused by unsafe or toxic levels of lead in drinking water. This study will help identify gaps in existing policies on water sampling to measure lead levels, replacement of water lines that contain lead, and public education aimed at reducing exposure to lead. The responsibility for avoiding harmful exposures to lead in drinking water is shared between water utilities, consumers, regulatory agencies and manufacturers. Findings from this study may help the EPA in revising the LCR. The findings may also help policy makers shape future laws and regulations, especially when multiple groups share responsibility for preventing toxic exposures to lead.

Funding Date: Mon, 11/15/2010

Researching Institution: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Researcher: Marc Edwards, Ph.D.; Stephanie Pollack, J.D.

Results

J. St. Clair, C. Stamopoulos, and M. Edwards (2012) Technical Note: Increased Distance Between Galvanic Lead:Copper Pipe Connections Decreases Lead Release. Corrosion: September 2012, Vol. 68, No. 9, pp. 779-783.

Cartier, C; R.B. Arnold, S. Triantafyllidou, M. Prévost and M. Edwards.  Effect of Flow Rate and Lead/Copper Pipe Sequence on Lead Release from Service LinesWater Research, 46(13) 4142-4152 (2012).

Edwards, M.  Discussion:  Effect of Changing Water Quality on Galvanic Coupling.  JAWWA 104(12) 65-82 (2012).
Expanded summary available at AWWA Journal.

 

Do HIV disclosure laws reduce infection?

This project will examine the impact of New Jersey’s HIV disclosure laws on 500 HIV+ and 250 “at risk” residents of New Jersey. Measures include participants’ understanding of the law, perceived HIV related stigma, comfort with seropositive status disclosure, HIV testing and sexual behavior.

Grant Number: 67137

Funding Date: Tue, 12/01/2009

Researching Institution: Medical College of Wisconsin, Hyacinth AIDS Foundation

Researcher: Carol L. Galletly, J.D., Ph.D., Axel Torres-Marrero, M.A.

Results

Carol L. Galletly, Laura R. Glasman, Steven D. Pinkerton, and Wayne DiFranceisco. New Jersey's HIV Exposure Law and the HIV-Related Attitudes, Beliefs, and Sexual and Seropositive Status Disclosure Behaviors of Persons Living With HIV. American Journal of Public Health. September 2012, e-View Ahead of Print. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300664

Paper alternatively available via SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2152097

Findings
Fifty-one percent of participants knew about the HIV exposure law. This awareness was not associated with increased sexual abstinence, condom use with most recent partner, or seropositive status disclosure. Contrary to hypotheses, persons who were unaware of the law experienced greater stigma and were less comfortable with positive serostatus disclosure. Criminializing nondisclosure of HIV serostatus does not reduce sexual risk behavior. Although the laws do not appear to increase stigma, they are also not likely to reduce HIV transmission.

Watch an online video teaser of the results: http://youtu.be/DBjIpl7tn5Q